Comparing the Treatment of Death in the Movie Antz and Antony and Cleop

Looking at the Treatment of Death in the Movie Antz and Antony and Cleopatra From the outset sight, Shakespeare’s Antony and Cleopatra and the film Antz appear to hold up under little likeness to one another. Not exclusively does a timeframe of just about 400 years separate the distribution of Antony and Cleopatra from the main communicate of Antz, however the very types of the characters contrast too. However, in the two stories the characters’ contemplations and activities are shockingly comparable, particularly with respect to the topical components of war and demise. Antony, the moderately aged Roman general in Antony and Cleopatra, and General Mandible, the brutal administrator in Antz, both offer the sentiment that the life of an individual fighter doesn't make a difference. Rather than attempting to guarantee the wellbeing of their warriors, they jeopardize them by facing extraordinary challenges. Antony continues battling Caesar adrift in spite of the fact that Enobarbus cautions him that a battle adrift would intend to â€Å"throw away the total soldiership [he] has via land â€Å" and to â€Å"give [himself up] only to risk and hazard.† Similarly, General Mandible proclaims war on the termite state and stays apathetic when Cutter, one of the officers, protests that a fight against the termites is self destruction. Antony and Cleopatra presents enormous scope passing in a more far off route than Antz. Shakespeare’s play doesn't contain bleeding war scenes showing killed men. Demise in Antony and Cleopatra holds a specific nobleness and pride in light of the fact that the crowd doesn't see unsavory snapshots of enduring nor distorted war casualties. Antz, on the other hand, shows the fierceness of war and the distorted cadavers of the ants and termites after the fight. Barbados, who spares Z’s life during the fight, is eviscerated - at the neck - by the ter... ...mes generally ghastly toward the end when General Mandible, in an abrupt uncontrolled wrath against Cutter, uncovers his entire brutality and yells: â€Å"I am the colony.† From the start sight one may expect that in Antony and Cleopatra war would be the overwhelming subject, for the Romans are notable as warriors all through their initial history. It might thusly be astounding to find that Shakespeare’s play concentrates less on itemized fight scenes than Antz, particularly since the last is a children’s film. However, perhaps the accentuation on war in the film isn't an inconsistency to the way that it is basically proposed for an exceptionally youthful crowd. Are not the offspring of today the voters and legislators of tomorrow and would it not be recipient for the eventual fate of humankind if before consenting to a war those voters and government officials helped themselves to remember Barbados’ final words â€Å"Think for yourself†?